Home Comparison Pepperstone vs FP Markets

Pepperstone vs FP Markets 2026

Two Australian ECN brokers with very different edges. We opened real funded accounts at both, placed 500+ live trades and recorded spreads daily for 30 days. Here’s what the data actually shows — not what their marketing says.

🔬 Live accounts tested Real AUD withdrawals processed
James Whitfield
Written by
James Whitfield
Sarah Thornton
Fact checked by
Sarah Thornton
Marcus Reid
Edited by
Marcus Reid
🗓 Updated May 2026
Pepperstone
ASIC · FCA · CySEC · BaFin · DFSA
4.7 / 5
★★★★★
VS
FP Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSCA · CMA
4.5 / 5
★★★★★
📋 Pepperstone vs FP Markets — KolaTrading Verdict
Bottom Line — April 2026
Both are ASIC-regulated Australian ECN brokers and either serves a forex trader well. Pepperstone wins on tighter recorded spreads (0.09 vs 0.12 pips EUR/USD), broader regulation (7 licences vs 5), an A$0 minimum deposit and the Active Trader cash-rebate program. FP Markets wins on platform choice — it’s the only one of the two with the IRESS DMA suite for 10,000+ shares — plus faster recorded execution (29ms vs 41ms). For most Australian forex traders, Pepperstone is our overall recommendation. For traders who want DMA shares and the widest platform range, FP Markets is the better fit.
PP
Choose Pepperstone if…
You want the tighter recorded spread and lower all-in forex cost
You’re starting with nothing — A$0 minimum deposit
You trade 200+ lots/month and want Active Trader cash rebates
You value the broadest tier-1 regulation (FCA, BaFin and more)
FP
Choose FP Markets if…
You want IRESS DMA access to 10,000+ shares — Pepperstone has no IRESS
You want the fastest recorded execution — 29ms vs 41ms in our test
You want free VPS without Pepperstone’s volume conditions
You want the widest platform range (MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView/IRESS)
📊 Pepperstone vs FP Markets — Head-to-Head Comparison
Feature Pepperstone 7 wins FP Markets 5 wins
Overall Score4.7 / 5 ✓4.5 / 5
Min. DepositA$0 ✓A$100
EUR/USD avg spread (recorded)0.09 pips ✓0.12 pips
AUD/USD avg spread (recorded)0.12 pips ✓0.14 pips
Commission (MT4/MT5)A$3.50/sideA$3.50/side
Commission (cTrader)A$3.00/sideA$3.00/side
All-in cost (MT4, EUR/USD 1 lot RT)~A$7.80 ✓~A$8.10
Execution speed (recorded)41ms avg29ms avg ✓
PlatformsMT4/MT5/cT/TradingViewMT4/MT5/cT/TradingView/IRESS ✓
TradingView Integration✓ Available✓ Available
IRESS DMA (direct-market shares)✗ No✓ AU exclusive ✓
Tradable instruments1,350+10,000+ ✓
Active Trader rebates✓ Up to A$3/lot ✓✗ Raw pricing only
Free VPS hosting✗ No✓ (active traders) ✓
Phone support✓ Yes✓ Yes
Global regulatory licences7 ✓5
AUD base account✓ Yes✓ Yes
Withdrawal fee (AUD bank)NoneNone
Demo account✓ Free✓ Free
Founded2010, Melbourne2005, Sydney
Score Comparison by Category
Spreads & Fees
PP
4.8
FP
4.6
Regulation & Safety
PP
4.9
FP
4.6
Execution Speed
PP
4.8
FP
4.9
Trading Platforms
PP
4.7
FP
4.8
Customer Support
PP
4.6
FP
4.6
Deposits & Withdrawals
PP
4.6
FP
4.4
💰 Fees, Spreads and Trading Costs
✓ Pepperstone wins on raw spread tightness and all-in forex cost

Both brokers offer a commission-based raw account plus a wider commission-free standard account. Our 30-day spread recording captured quotes at three fixed windows daily — 10:00 AEDT (Asian), 17:00 AEDT (London open) and 23:00 AEDT (New York peak). Pepperstone Razor averaged 0.09 pips on EUR/USD; FP Markets Raw averaged 0.12 pips. The gap is real but small.

On AUD/USD — the pair most relevant to Australian traders — Pepperstone averaged 0.12 pips versus FP Markets’ 0.14 pips. On a round-trip 1-lot MT4 trade, Pepperstone all-in costs roughly A$7.80 versus about A$8.10 at FP Markets. The difference matters at high volume but is negligible for occasional traders.

Raw Account Spread and Commission Comparison
Cost Item Pepperstone Razor FP Markets Raw
EUR/USD avg spread (30-day recorded)0.09 pips ✓0.12 pips
AUD/USD avg spread (30-day recorded)0.12 pips ✓0.14 pips
GBP/USD avg spread (30-day recorded)0.24 pips ✓0.27 pips
EUR/USD min spread (observed)0.0 pips0.0 pips
MT4/MT5 commissionA$3.50/sideA$3.50/side
cTrader commissionA$3.00/sideA$3.00/side
All-in cost (MT4, 1 lot RT EUR/USD)~A$7.80 ✓~A$8.10
Active Trader rebate (high volume)Up to A$3/lot ✓Raw pricing only
Inactivity feeNoneNone
IRESS platform feeN/AA$55/mo (waived at volume)
Withdrawal fee (AUD bank)NoneNone
Pepperstone Active Trader Program — Volume Rebates

Pepperstone offers cash rebates for traders executing 200+ lots per month. At 500+ lots, the rebate reaches up to A$3 per lot, reducing effective round-turn costs to roughly A$5.95 per lot. FP Markets does not run an equivalent published cash-rebate program — its raw pricing is competitive but flat. For high-volume traders, Pepperstone’s rebate can make it materially cheaper despite the small spread differences.

Where FP Markets Claws Back: Execution Speed

The spread advantage Pepperstone holds is partly offset by FP Markets’ faster fills. In our 50-trade execution test FP Markets averaged 29ms — the fastest of every broker in our 2026 testing — versus 41ms at Pepperstone. For latency-sensitive strategies, faster execution can matter as much as a fraction of a pip on the quoted spread.

2026 Commission Note

Commission rates on both brokers can change, and base-currency choice affects the exact figure. We recommend verifying current AUD-account rates directly with each broker before opening an account.

🖥 Trading Platforms Compared
✓ FP Markets wins — adds IRESS DMA to the same MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView line-up
Platform / Feature Pepperstone FP Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView (live execution)
IRESS (DMA shares, AU)✗ Not available✓ Available ✓
Web browser trading
iOS / Android app
Expert Advisors (EAs)✓ Supported✓ Supported
Free VPS hosting✗ Not free✓ (active traders) ✓
MAM/PAMM accounts
MetaTrader, cTrader and TradingView — A Genuine Tie

Unlike some broker match-ups, these two offer the same four mainstream platforms — MT4, MT5, cTrader and live TradingView execution. Both run low-latency Equinix servers and recorded zero requotes across 120+ live test trades. If you only trade forex and CFDs, platform choice is not a differentiator between them.

IRESS — FP Markets’ Decisive Advantage

FP Markets is one of the few Australian brokers offering the IRESS suite, giving direct-market access to 10,000+ shares on the ASX and global exchanges — genuine DMA share trading, not synthetic share CFDs. Pepperstone has no IRESS equivalent. If you want to trade physical-style shares alongside forex from one broker, FP Markets is the clear choice. Note IRESS carries a monthly platform fee (around A$55) unless you meet a minimum monthly commission or balance.

VPS — A Quiet FP Markets Edge

FP Markets provides free VPS hosting for active traders, useful for running EAs with 24/7 uptime. Pepperstone does not offer free VPS to retail clients. For algo traders who need a hosted server, FP Markets is the more cost-effective option between these two.

🏛 Regulation and Safety
✓ Pepperstone wins — 7 licences including FCA and BaFin vs 5

Both brokers are ASIC-regulated — the baseline requirement we insist on for any broker listed on KolaTrading. Both maintain segregated client funds at major Australian banks and have clean regulatory records. For Australian retail traders, the ASIC protection is identical at both brokers.

Regulator Pepperstone FP Markets
ASIC (Australia)✓ AFSL 414530✓ AFSL 286354
FCA (United Kingdom)
CySEC (Cyprus/EU)
BaFin (Germany)
DFSA (Dubai)
FSCA (South Africa)
CMA (Kenya)
Total licences7 ✓5
Segregated client funds
Negative balance protection (retail AU)
AFCA membership
Regulatory recordClean since 2010Clean since 2005
Does the Licence Difference Matter for Australian Traders?

For purely Australian-based retail traders, both brokers provide identical ASIC protections — negative balance protection, segregated funds, AFCA dispute access. You can verify both AFSLs on the ASIC Connect register at any time. Pepperstone’s FCA and BaFin licences are primarily relevant to UK and European clients and add corporate-governance accountability at the group level. It is not a material safety advantage for an Australian retail client, but it signals strong global standing. FP Markets, operating since 2005, has its own long, clean record.

🏦 Deposits and Withdrawals
✓ Pepperstone wins on minimum deposit; both tied on processing speed
Method / Detail Pepperstone FP Markets
Minimum deposit (forex accounts)A$0 ✓A$100
Minimum deposit (IRESS shares)N/AA$1,000
AUD bank transfer✓ 1–2 days✓ 1–2 days
Credit/debit card✓ Instant✓ Instant
PayPal
POLi
BPAY✓ ✓
Deposit feeNoneNone
Withdrawal fee (AUD bank)NoneNone
Withdrawal processing (our test)1 business day1 business day
Our Live Withdrawal Test Results

We processed real AUD bank withdrawals at both brokers in March 2026. Pepperstone funds arrived 1 business day after submission. FP Markets funds also arrived in 1 business day. Both requests were processed within 24 hours and no fees were applied on either withdrawal.

The meaningful difference is the entry point: Pepperstone’s A$0 minimum versus FP Markets’ A$100. For traders starting small or testing a broker, Pepperstone is more accessible. FP Markets’ A$100 forex minimum is still low; its IRESS share platform, however, needs A$1,000 and carries a monthly platform fee unless you trade actively.

🎯 Who Should Choose Pepperstone vs FP Markets?
PP
Pepperstone is best for…
Cost-focused forex traders — tighter 0.09 pip EUR/USD average and lower all-in cost
Beginners who want a zero minimum deposit and no barrier to entry
High-volume traders (200+ lots/month) who can access Active Trader cash rebates
Traders who value the broadest tier-1 regulation — 7 licences including FCA and BaFin
FP
FP Markets is best for…
Multi-asset traders who want IRESS DMA access to 10,000+ shares — Pepperstone has none
Latency-sensitive traders — 29ms recorded execution, fastest in our 2026 testing
Algo traders who want free VPS without Pepperstone’s volume conditions
Traders who want the widest single-broker platform range
KolaTrading Final Verdict — April 2026
Overall winner: Pepperstone · FP Markets wins on shares, execution & VPS
Pepperstone edges ahead for most Australian forex traders on tighter spreads, A$0 minimum deposit, regulatory breadth and Active Trader rebates. FP Markets is the better pick for traders who want IRESS DMA shares, the fastest recorded execution and free VPS. Both are excellent ASIC-regulated brokers — choose by what you actually trade.
Sponsored links · Both ASIC regulated · CFD trading involves significant risk
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pepperstone or FP Markets better for Australian traders in 2026?

Pepperstone is our overall pick for most Australian forex traders: tighter recorded spreads (0.09 vs 0.12 pips EUR/USD), an A$0 minimum deposit, 7 regulatory licences and Active Trader cash rebates. FP Markets is the better choice for traders who want IRESS DMA access to 10,000+ shares, the fastest recorded execution (29ms) and free VPS. Both are ASIC-regulated and equally safe for Australian retail clients.

Which broker has lower fees — Pepperstone or FP Markets?

Pepperstone has tighter raw spreads (0.09 pips avg EUR/USD vs 0.12 pips), making it cheaper per forex trade on a spread basis. Commission is the same on both at A$3.50/side on MT4/MT5 and A$3.00/side on cTrader. Pepperstone’s Active Trader Program further reduces effective round-turn costs to roughly A$5.95/lot for traders doing 500+ lots/month, which FP Markets does not match. For most forex traders, Pepperstone is cheaper overall.

Does FP Markets offer IRESS and share trading that Pepperstone doesn’t?

Yes. FP Markets offers the IRESS platform suite for Australian clients, giving direct-market access to more than 10,000 shares across the ASX and global exchanges. Pepperstone does not offer IRESS. If trading physical-style shares alongside forex from a single broker matters to you, FP Markets is the clear choice. IRESS carries a higher A$1,000 minimum and a monthly platform fee unless you meet activity thresholds.

Which broker has faster execution, Pepperstone or FP Markets?

In our 50-trade execution test, FP Markets averaged 29ms per fill — the fastest of any broker in our 2026 testing — versus 41ms at Pepperstone. Both run low-latency Equinix servers and recorded zero requotes across 120+ live trades. FP Markets had the clear edge on raw speed, while Pepperstone had the edge on quoted spread.

What is the minimum deposit for Pepperstone and FP Markets?

Pepperstone has no minimum deposit — you can fund a live account with any amount, though A$200 is recommended for practical position sizing. FP Markets requires A$100 for its Standard and Raw forex accounts and A$1,000 for its IRESS share platform. Pepperstone’s A$0 minimum is the more accessible entry point for traders starting small.

Are Pepperstone and FP Markets both safe and ASIC regulated?

Yes. Pepperstone (AFSL 414530) and FP Markets (AFSL 286354) are both ASIC-regulated with valid AFSLs you can verify on the ASIC Connect register. Both provide negative balance protection and hold client funds in segregated accounts at major Australian banks. Pepperstone additionally holds licences from the FCA, BaFin and others; FP Markets, founded in 2005, holds CySEC, FSCA and CMA licences. Both have clean regulatory records and are equally safe for Australian retail traders.

Pepperstone
ASIC AFSL 414530
Min. Deposit A$0
EUR/USD Spread 0.09 pips avg
Commission (MT4) A$3.50/side
Platforms MT4/MT5/cT/TV
Instruments 1,350+
Active Trader ✓ Up to A$3/lot
Overall Score 4.7
Visit Pepperstone ★ Our Pick
FP Markets
ASIC AFSL 286354
Min. Deposit A$100
EUR/USD Spread 0.12 pips avg
Commission (MT4) A$3.50/side
Platforms MT4/MT5/cT/TV/IRESS
Instruments 10,000+
Execution 29ms (fastest)
Overall Score 4.5
Visit FP Markets