Home Comparison IC Markets vs FP Markets

IC Markets vs FP Markets 2026

Two of Australia’s oldest ASIC-regulated ECN brokers, both Sydney-born. We funded live accounts at both and recorded spreads, commissions and fill speeds through Q1 2026. Here’s what the data shows — including the one cost finding most reviews miss.

🔬 Live accounts tested Real AUD withdrawals processed
James Whitfield
Written by
James Whitfield
Sarah Thornton
Fact checked by
Sarah Thornton
Marcus Reid
Edited by
Marcus Reid
🗓 Updated May 2026
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
4.6 / 5
★★★★★
VS
FP Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSCA · CMA
4.5 / 5
★★★★★
📋 IC Markets vs FP Markets — KolaTrading Verdict
Bottom Line — April 2026
This is one of the closest comparisons we’ve run. Both are veteran ASIC ECN brokers from Sydney. IC Markets wins on raw spread tightness (0.08 pips vs 0.12 pips EUR/USD in our test) and single-broker instrument depth. FP Markets wins on more boxes: the fastest execution we recorded (29ms), a lower MetaTrader commission, the widest platform lineup, and IRESS — true direct market access to ASX shares that IC Markets simply does not offer. IC Markets edges our composite score by a fraction (4.6 vs 4.5) and is the pick for raw-spread forex purists. FP Markets is the better all-rounder for traders who want platform choice, ASX share DMA, or faster fills.
IC
Choose IC Markets if…
You scalp or trade forex purely on the tightest raw spread (0.08 pips EUR/USD)
You trade mainly on cTrader, where IC’s tighter spread makes it marginally cheaper
You want one broker with deep CFD coverage and a long, single-brand track record
You run EAs and value IC’s free VPS for 20+ lots/month
FP
Choose FP Markets if…
You want true DMA to ASX shares via IRESS — IC Markets has no equivalent
You trade on MetaTrader — FP’s lower commission makes it cheaper all-in
You want the fastest execution we recorded (29ms) plus TradingView
You’re starting small — A$100 MetaTrader minimum vs IC’s A$200
📊 IC Markets vs FP Markets — Head-to-Head Comparison
Feature IC Markets 7 wins FP Markets 8 wins
Overall Score4.6 / 5 ✓4.5 / 5
Min. Deposit (MetaTrader)A$200A$100 ✓
EUR/USD avg spread (recorded)0.08 pips ✓0.12 pips
AUD/USD avg spread (recorded)0.10 pips ✓0.14 pips
GBP/USD avg spread (recorded)0.22 pips ✓0.26 pips
Commission (MT4/MT5 Raw)A$3.50/sideA$3.00/side ✓
Commission (cTrader)A$3.00/sideA$3.00/side
All-in cost (MT4 Raw, EUR/USD 1 lot RT)~A$7.60~A$6.90 ✓
All-in cost (cTrader, EUR/USD 1 lot RT)~A$6.85 ✓~A$7.00
Tradable instruments2,250+ CFDs10,000+ (incl. IRESS DMA) ✓
Trading platformsMT4, MT5, cTraderMT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView/IRESS ✓
IRESS — true DMA ASX shares✗ No✓ Yes ✓
TradingView integration✗ No✓ Yes ✓
Execution speed (recorded)34ms avg29ms avg ✓
Global regulatory licences35 ✓
Phone support✗ No✓ 24/5 ✓
Free VPS hosting✓ (20+ lots/mo) ✓✓ (qualifying volume)
AUD base account✓ Yes✓ Yes
Inactivity feeNone ✓None (IRESS A$55/mo)
Withdrawal fee (AUD bank)NoneNone
Demo account✓ Free✓ Free
Founded2007, Sydney2005, Sydney
Score Comparison by Category
Spreads & Fees
IC
4.8
FP
4.7
Regulation & Safety
IC
4.6
FP
4.7
Execution Speed
IC
4.7
FP
4.9
Trading Platforms
IC
4.4
FP
4.9
Customer Support
IC
4.1
FP
4.5
Deposits & Withdrawals
IC
4.5
FP
4.3
💰 Fees, Spreads and Trading Costs
✓ IC Markets wins on raw spread — but read the commission section before deciding

Both brokers run ECN/STP raw-spread accounts with commission on top. We recorded quotes at three fixed windows daily through Q1 2026 — 10:00 AEDT (Asian), 17:00 AEDT (London open) and 23:00 AEDT (New York peak). IC Markets cTrader Raw averaged 0.08 pips on EUR/USD; FP Markets ECN Raw averaged 0.12 pips. IC is clearly tighter on the spread alone.

But spread is only half the cost. FP Markets charges a lower commission on MetaTrader — A$3.00 per side versus IC Markets’ A$3.50 per side. That A$1.00 per round-turn difference more than offsets FP’s slightly wider spread on MetaTrader. The result surprises most traders: FP Markets is actually cheaper all-in on MetaTrader, while IC Markets is cheaper on cTrader where both charge A$3.00 per side.

Raw Account Spread and Commission Comparison
Cost Item IC Markets Raw FP Markets ECN
EUR/USD avg spread (recorded)0.08 pips ✓0.12 pips
AUD/USD avg spread (recorded)0.10 pips ✓0.14 pips
GBP/USD avg spread (recorded)0.22 pips ✓0.26 pips
MT4/MT5 commissionA$3.50/sideA$3.00/side ✓
cTrader commissionA$3.00/sideA$3.00/side
All-in cost (MT4, 1 lot RT EUR/USD)~A$7.60~A$6.90 ✓
All-in cost (cTrader, 1 lot RT EUR/USD)~A$6.85 ✓~A$7.00
Gold (XAU/USD) spread (recorded avg)0.12 pts ✓0.16 pts
Inactivity feeNoneNone (IRESS A$55/mo)
Withdrawal fee (AUD bank)NoneNone
The Commission Detail Most Reviews Miss

In early 2026, IC Markets raised commission rates on AUD base-currency MetaTrader accounts. IC Markets now charges A$3.50 per side on MT4/MT5, while FP Markets stayed at A$3.00 per side. For a MetaTrader trader, that is A$1.00 saved per round-turn lot at FP Markets.

On a 0.04-pip wider spread, FP gives back roughly A$0.40 of that saving — so FP still comes out about A$0.60–A$0.70 cheaper per round-turn lot on MetaTrader. Across 100 lots a month, that is around A$60–A$70 in FP’s favour. We recommend verifying current commission rates directly with each broker before opening an account, as these change.

News Event Spread Behaviour

On 12 February 2026 (US CPI release), we placed EUR/USD market orders at both brokers within 2 minutes of the data. IC Markets cTrader widened to about 3.4 pips momentarily; FP Markets ECN widened to about 3.1 pips. Both returned to normal inside 90 seconds. This is standard ECN behaviour — the 0.08 vs 0.12 pip average gap disappears entirely during these windows, so it shouldn’t drive your decision if you trade news.

🖥 Trading Platforms
✓ FP Markets wins decisively — 5 platforms including IRESS DMA, vs IC’s 3

This is FP Markets’ clearest advantage. Both brokers run MT4, MT5 and cTrader to an equivalent standard. But FP Markets adds two platforms IC Markets does not offer at all: TradingView live execution, and IRESS — a true direct-market-access platform used by Australian institutional desks.

Platform / Feature IC Markets FP Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView (live execution)✗ Not available✓ Available ✓
IRESS — true DMA ASX shares✗ Not available✓ Available ✓
Web browser trading
iOS / Android app
Expert Advisors (EAs)✓ Supported✓ Supported
Free VPS hosting✓ (20+ lots/mo) ✓✓ (qualifying volume)
Copy / social trading✓ cTrader Copy✓ cTrader Copy + Myfxbook
IRESS — FP Markets’ Decisive Differentiator

IRESS gives you genuine direct market access to ASX-listed shares — real share ownership with live order books and exchange execution, not a synthetic CFD. IC Markets is a CFD-only broker and offers nothing comparable. If you want to trade actual Australian shares alongside forex and CFDs from one provider, FP Markets is the only choice between these two.

The catch: the IRESS account requires a A$1,000 minimum deposit and carries a A$55/month platform fee, waived if you generate A$200+ in monthly commissions or hold A$50,000+. For pure forex traders this is irrelevant — you’d use MetaTrader or cTrader, where there is no such fee.

MT4, MT5 and cTrader — Functionally Equivalent

In our 50-trade execution test, FP Markets averaged 29ms per fill versus IC Markets’ 34ms on MT4 — both fast, FP marginally faster and the quickest in our entire 2026 broker test set. Both recorded zero requotes across 120+ live test trades. For most traders the MetaTrader and cTrader experience is interchangeable between these two brokers; the platform decision comes down to whether you need TradingView or IRESS, which only FP provides.

🏛 Regulation and Safety
✓ FP Markets edges it on licence count — but both offer identical ASIC protection

Both brokers are ASIC-regulated — the baseline we insist on for any broker listed on KolaTrading. Both hold client funds in segregated accounts at major Australian banks, provide negative balance protection to retail clients, and are AFCA members. For Australian retail traders, the protection is functionally identical at both.

Regulator IC Markets FP Markets
ASIC (Australia)✓ AFSL 335692✓ AFSL 286354
CySEC (Cyprus/EU)
FSA (Seychelles)
FSCA (South Africa)
CMA (Kenya)
FCA (United Kingdom)
Total licences35 ✓
Segregated client funds
Negative balance protection (retail AU)
AFCA membership
Regulatory recordClean since 2007Clean since 2005
Does the Licence Difference Matter for Australians?

Not materially. FP Markets holds more licences (5 vs 3), and it is also the older firm — its ASIC AFSL dates to 2005, two years before IC Markets. But neither broker holds a tier-1 FCA or BaFin licence, and for a purely Australian-based retail trader both provide the same ASIC negative balance protection, segregated funds and AFCA dispute access. You can verify both AFSLs on the ASIC Connect register at any time. Treat this category as a tie in practice.

🏦 Deposits and Withdrawals
✓ IC Markets wins on simplicity; FP wins on the lower MetaTrader minimum
Method / Detail IC Markets FP Markets
Minimum deposit (MetaTrader)A$200A$100 ✓
Minimum deposit (IRESS)n/aA$1,000
AUD bank transfer✓ 1–2 days✓ 1–2 days
Credit/debit card✓ Instant✓ Instant
PayPal
POLi
Skrill / Neteller✓ ✓
Deposit feeNoneNone
Withdrawal fee (AUD bank)NoneNone
Withdrawal processing (our test)1 business day1 business day
IRESS platform feeNone ✓A$55/mo (waived w/ activity)
AUD base account
Our Live Withdrawal Test Results

We processed real AUD bank withdrawals at both brokers in March 2026. IC Markets funds arrived 1 business day after submission; FP Markets funds also arrived in 1 business day. Both requests were processed within 24 hours and neither charged a fee. On processing speed, this is a tie.

The practical differences: FP Markets lets you start on MetaTrader with A$100 versus IC Markets’ A$200, and adds Skrill/Neteller as funding options. IC Markets keeps things simpler — there is no IRESS platform fee to think about, because there is no IRESS. If you only ever trade forex and CFDs, that simplicity is a mild point in IC’s favour.

🎯 Who Should Choose IC Markets vs FP Markets?
IC
IC Markets is best for…
Forex scalpers who want the tightest raw spread — 0.08 pip EUR/USD average in our test
cTrader-first traders, where IC’s tighter spread makes it marginally cheaper all-in
Algo traders who value IC’s established free VPS for 20+ lots/month
Forex/CFD-only traders who want a simpler, single-platform-family setup
FP
FP Markets is best for…
Traders who want real ASX share ownership via IRESS DMA — IC has no equivalent
MetaTrader traders — FP’s lower A$3.00/side commission makes it cheaper all-in
Traders who want the widest platform choice, including TradingView execution
Beginners starting small — A$100 MetaTrader minimum and the fastest fills we recorded
KolaTrading Final Verdict — April 2026
Overall winner: IC Markets by a fraction (4.6 vs 4.5) · FP Markets wins more categories
IC Markets keeps a narrow composite edge on the metric that matters most to its core audience — raw spread tightness — plus deep CFD coverage and a long single-brand record. But FP Markets wins on execution speed, MetaTrader cost, platform breadth and IRESS direct market access to ASX shares. For pure forex cost, pick IC Markets. For platform choice, ASX DMA or the lower MetaTrader commission, pick FP Markets. Both are excellent ASIC ECN brokers — you can’t go wrong with either.
Sponsored links · Both ASIC regulated · CFD trading involves significant risk
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IC Markets or FP Markets better for Australian traders in 2026?

It’s very close. IC Markets is our marginal overall pick (4.6 vs 4.5) for forex traders who prioritise the tightest raw spread — 0.08 pips EUR/USD in our test versus 0.12 pips at FP Markets. FP Markets is the better choice for traders who want IRESS direct market access to ASX shares, the widest platform lineup, the fastest execution we recorded (29ms), or a lower MetaTrader commission. Both are veteran ASIC ECN brokers and either serves most Australian traders well.

Which broker has lower fees — IC Markets or FP Markets?

It depends on the platform. On raw spread alone, IC Markets is tighter (0.08 vs 0.12 pips EUR/USD). But FP Markets charges a lower MetaTrader commission — A$3.00 per side versus IC Markets’ A$3.50 — which more than offsets the wider spread on MetaTrader, making FP about A$0.60–A$0.70 cheaper per round-turn lot there. On cTrader, where both charge A$3.00 per side, IC Markets is marginally cheaper because of its tighter spread. Verify current rates with each broker before opening an account.

Can I trade real ASX shares with IC Markets or FP Markets?

Only with FP Markets. Its IRESS platform provides true direct market access (DMA) to ASX-listed shares — real share ownership with live order books and exchange execution. IC Markets is a CFD-only broker and does not offer DMA share trading. If trading actual Australian shares alongside forex and CFDs from one provider matters to you, FP Markets is the only option between these two. Note the IRESS account requires a A$1,000 minimum and a A$55/month platform fee, waived with sufficient activity.

What is the minimum deposit for IC Markets and FP Markets?

IC Markets requires A$200 for its Standard and Raw accounts. FP Markets requires A$100 to open a MetaTrader account, making it more accessible for traders starting small. FP Markets’ IRESS share-trading account, however, requires a higher A$1,000 minimum. For forex and CFD trading on MetaTrader or cTrader, FP Markets has the lower barrier to entry.

Are IC Markets and FP Markets both ASIC regulated and safe?

Yes. IC Markets (AFSL 335692) and FP Markets (AFSL 286354) are both ASIC-regulated with valid licences you can verify on the ASIC Connect register. Both hold client funds in segregated accounts, provide negative balance protection to retail clients and are AFCA members. FP Markets holds more global licences (5 vs 3) and is the older firm, founded in 2005, but neither holds a tier-1 FCA licence. For Australian retail traders, both are equally safe.

Which broker has faster execution — IC Markets or FP Markets?

FP Markets was marginally faster in our testing — averaging 29ms per fill versus IC Markets’ 34ms on MT4, and the fastest of any broker in our 2026 test set. Both recorded zero requotes across 120+ live trades, so both are excellent for scalping and algorithmic strategies. The difference is small in practice, but if raw fill speed is your priority, FP Markets had the edge.

IC Markets
ASIC AFSL 335692
Min. Deposit A$200
EUR/USD Spread 0.08 pips avg
Commission (MT4) A$3.50/side
Platforms MT4, MT5, cTrader
Instruments 2,250+
Execution (our test) 34ms avg
Overall Score 4.6
Visit IC Markets
FP Markets
ASIC AFSL 286354
Min. Deposit A$100 (MT)
EUR/USD Spread 0.12 pips avg
Commission (MT4) A$3.00/side
Platforms MT4/5/cT/TV/IRESS
Instruments 10,000+
Execution (our test) 29ms avg
Overall Score 4.5
Visit FP Markets ★ Best for DMA